This is because they interact with him or her every day. However, a high level of trust is required from these students, and their input may be necessary to affirm their role in the classroom. If you build your relationships, it should not be limited to your colleagues.
If you can engage with colleagues from other institutions, engaging with students can be an effective and practical way of exploring learning capabilities and experiences for your students. If you want to improve content knowledge as a teacher, you can engage with colleagues who bear the same responsibilities. If you can arrange with your curriculum coordinator, and find time to collaborate with your colleagues, you will make the right progress in your career.
You can use this as a chance to talk about the best classroom practices, getting deeper in content knowledge, as well as sharing effective leaning techniques. This helps you to avoid isolation, which sometimes happens in the teaching profession. Your effort will break down the alone time and enhance your experience. If teaching was all about content, then the best mathematicians would be among the best teachers. However, if you can combine your understanding of the content and ability to effectively work with your colleagues, and the knowledge on how your students learn, you will achieve effective teaching.
Since the classroom is a dynamic environment, incorporating excellent practical approaches to teaching can prove effective. This enhances the success of your students. Consider the following practical teaching for educators as strategies:. As a teacher, you are expected to bring to life academic concepts through visual and practical learning experiences.
You can have an interactive whiteboard to display photos, videos, and other illustrations. Let students participate in out-of-classroom experiments and local excursions. You can pose thought-provoking questions and encourage students to have independent thinking. It also makes them independent learners. You can also invite them to ask their questions and investigate ideas to enhance their problem-solving skills and have a deeper understanding of the academic concepts.
With a system in place that helps students prepare for life after education, they receive a better idea of what it is they want their future to hold, it saves valuable time and money, and above all, that extra training and preparation makes a student more appealing to business and gives more stability in the hiring process.
Instead, they take the initiative before finishing their studies to create an assured vision of what they want - hugely beneficial to both themselves and their employer. In fact, Martin Birchall, Managing Director of HighFliers Research has claimed that work experience is no longer an optional extra for students - it is a must have.
Having that experience helps to build that required attitude - and can go a long way to shrugging off the perception that Millennials are the self-entitled, lazy workers that many would have you believe. Professional experience is more than being able to type out emails to a client, make tea for the entire office or effectively manage the day-to-day tasks of work life without someone peering over your shoulder for every 20 minutes.
Professional experience integrates theory and practice; it is the midway point between theory and practice. This process of work is attractive to all kinds of industries. If teachers introduce technical terms only as needed to clarify thinking and promote effective communication, then students will gradually build a functional vocabulary that will survive beyond the next test. For teachers to concentrate on vocabulary, however, is to detract from science as a process, to put learning for understanding in jeopardy, and to risk being misled about what students have learned.
Science is more than a body of knowledge and a way of accumulating and validating that knowledge. It is also a social activity that incorporates certain human values. However, they are all highly characteristic of the scientific endeavor. In learning science, students should encounter such values as part of their experience, not as empty claims.
This suggests that teachers should strive to do the following:. Science, mathematics, and technology do not create curiosity. Thus, science teachers should encourage students to raise questions about the material being studied, help them learn to frame their questions clearly enough to begin to search for answers, suggest to them productive ways for finding answers, and reward those who raise and then pursue unusual but relevant questions.
In the science classroom, wondering should be as highly valued as knowing. Scientists, mathematicians, and engineers prize the creative use of imagination. Indeed, teachers can express their own creativity by inventing activities in which students' creativity and imagination will pay off. Science, mathematics, and engineering prosper because of the institutionalized skepticism of their practitioners.
Their central tenet is that one's evidence, logic, and claims will be questioned, and one's experiments will be subjected to replication. In science classrooms, it should be the normal practice for teachers to raise such questions as: How do we know? What is the evidence? What is the argument that interprets the evidence?
Are there alternative explanations or other ways of solving the problem that could be better? The aim should be to get students into the habit of posing such questions and framing answers. Students should experience science as a process for extending understanding, not as unalterable truth.
This means that teachers must take care not to convey the impression that they themselves or the textbooks are absolute authorities whose conclusions are always correct.
By dealing with the credibility of scientific claims, the overturn of accepted scientific beliefs, and what to make out of disagreements among scientists, science teachers can help students to balance the necessity for accepting a great deal of science on faith against the importance of keeping an open mind. Many people regard science as cold and uninteresting. However, a scientific understanding of, say, the formation of stars, the blue of the sky, or the construction of the human heart need not displace the romantic and spiritual meanings of such phenomena.
Teachers of science, mathematics, and technology should establish a learning environment in which students are able to broaden and deepen their response to the beauty of ideas, methods, tools, structures, objects, and living organisms. Teachers should recognize that for many students, the learning of mathematics and science involves feelings of severe anxiety and fear of failure. No doubt this results partly from what is taught and the way it is taught, and partly from attitudes picked up incidentally very early in schooling from parents and teachers who are themselves ill at ease with science and mathematics.
Far from dismissing math and science anxiety as groundless, though, teachers should assure students that they understand the problem and will work with them to overcome it. Teachers can take such measures as the following:. Teachers should make sure that students have some sense of success in learning science and mathematics, and they should deemphasize getting all the right answers as being the main criterion of success. After all, science itself, as Alfred North Whitehead said, is never quite right.
Understanding anything is never absolute, and it takes many forms. Many students are fearful of using laboratory instruments and other tools. This fear may result primarily from the lack of opportunity many of them have to become familiar with tools in safe circumstances. Girls in particular suffer from the mistaken notion that boys are naturally more adept at using tools. Starting in the earliest grades, all students should gradually gain familiarity with tools and the proper use of tools.
By the time they finish school, all students should have had supervised experience with common hand tools, soldering irons, electrical meters, drafting tools, optical and sound equipment, calculators, and computers. Because the scientific and engineering professions have been predominantly male and white, female and minority students could easily get the impression that these fields are beyond them or are otherwise unsuited to them.
Teachers should select learning materials that illustrate the contributions of women and minorities, bring in role models, and make it clear to female and minority students that they are expected to study the same subjects at the same level as everyone else and to perform as well.
A group approach has motivational value apart from the need to use team learning as noted earlier to promote an understanding of how science and engineering work. Overemphasis on competition among students for high grades distorts what ought to be the prime motive for studying science: to find things out.
Competition among students in the science classroom may also result in many of them developing a dislike of science and losing their confidence in their ability to learn science. Group approaches, the norm in science, have many advantages in education; for instance, they help youngsters see that everyone can contribute to the attainment of common goals and that progress does not depend on everyone's having the same abilities. Children learn from their parents, siblings, other relatives, peers, and adult authority figures, as well as from teachers.
They learn from movies, television, radio, records, trade books and magazines, and home computers, and from going to museums and zoos, parties, club meetings, rock concerts, and sports events, as well as from schoolbooks and the school environment in general.
0コメント